| So how does one evaluate a teacher? By price?
By convenience? By education? We think that the best way
to judge any program or teacher is by the results they
get. In other words, do their students improve and where
do their students end up? There is no other studio or
school in the area who can claim results comparable to
ours at Golden Voice Studio. We are known for getting
very quick results so why spend the same amount of money
or more for a teacher who takes longer to get results?
Don’t you want to get better as fast as possible?
Following is an article that provides some good perspective
on this topic.
“More is demanded of the professional singer today
than ever before. Not only must you have the voice but
also you must have the brains. Not only must you have
a good musical instrument, but you must use it for the
expression of the thoughts and emotions that define
and motivate humanity.
You cannot learn to sing from a book or a record. It
takes personal interaction. You need a trained ear listening
to you, encouraging you when you make progress and alerting
you to bad habits that inhibit your progress.
It is also important to find a teacher who really understands
the basic vocal mechanisms, and can effectively educate
the student. My gripe with so many of the teachers is
that they just sit and play scales and don't really
explain how to get the most benefit from each scale.
Today's teachers vocalize, they exercise, but they don't
educate their students.
A teacher must be honest, and must be able to demonstrate
the technique, and be able to show the control of their
own voice. Never study with a teacher who is chronically
hoarse. The teaching and the technique should be very
natural. While proper technique may be difficult to
learn, it should not make you feel physically uncomfortable.
If a technique takes a great deal of physical effort
to demonstrate, then it cannot be correct. This is one
area where the old saying, "Those that can't do...teach,"
does not apply. If your teacher does not have a beautiful
vocal instrument, beware. Even though the goal of study
is not to imitate the teacher, a voice teacher should
be able to demonstrate the validity of the methods he
or she is teaching.
The job of a voice teacher is to teach you to control,
and thereby free the voice to develop to its full potential.
A teacher should not impose a style for you, for style
and flair come from within. When you are vocally free
to express you own feelings, your unique style will
develop naturally.
Why do so many reputable teachers hold so many different
opinions, whether they teach privately or in music schools?
The main reason is that there is no single authority
whose judgment on singing is universally accepted. Unlike
any other branch of study, the teaching of singing can
be practiced in any country without a certificate of
proficiency. An untrained teacher can set up practice
in any country without a certificate of proficiency.
An untrained teacher can set up practice, begin to publicize
themselves, and develop a large group of unlucky students.
Even a bad teacher can set up a practice, begin to publicize
themselves, and develop a large group of unlucky students.
Even a bad teacher might occasionally find a student
with an exceptional voice, which, with careful study,
might have developed into an outstanding instrument.
But by improper training, the voice may be damaged or
irreparably harmed. Such self-appointed authorities
probably never passed an exam and never had to explain
what right they had to teach.
People come to teaching by different roads. Some teachers
have planned to teach from the outset and use their
good and bad experiences from their years becoming or
trying to become singers to help others. Some start
teaching after more or less successful careers. Some
take up teaching because they never realized their own
ambitions. Some teachers try to build up a large clientele
by developing a stable of associates, that is, student
teachers who are still studying themselves. These "associates,"
at best, parrot the method of the master teacher. At
worst, they damage the unwary students they come in
contact with, for they lack the experience to oversee
the building of a voice.
Singers must examine their motives very carefully before
deciding to pursue a career as a teacher. The general
attitude, a patient temperament, is very important.
The danger with some active singers who teach is that
they sometimes compete with their students. The teacher
has to feel love for the student, like a responsible
parent, not like a baby sitter who dislikes children
and only takes the job for the money.
This brings us to the financial motive. A reputable
teacher should have asked themselves this questions:
"Am I in this profession for its own sake, or only
for the income I can derive from it?" The best
motive for teaching is the love of voice and the joy
of developing a voice to its fullest potential.
Apart from the ability to teach, it is critical to hear
objectively as well as subjectively as singers normally
do, to be able to diagnose what is heard. The skills
are to recognize how a student is producing their sound,
identify the things that inhibit the sound, and apply
the correct remedy. In other words, the diagnosis is
like that of a doctor's, who looks at the symptoms for
a clue to the cause of the trouble.
Many good singers are not able to teach because they
lack this ability, while some have a dual gift for singing
and teaching. Coaches who are often unable to sing well
themselves often lack the knack for teaching. Dedicated
professional teachers are interested in teaching even
during a period of successful activity in their own
careers. If they possess the talent of listening critically,
they may continue to learn much and apply it to their
own careers. If they possess the talent of listening
critically, they may continue to learn much and apply
it to their own singing. Good teachers, too, can learn
from teaching.
An objective way to judge a teacher is to hear his or
her students at certain intervals. Any teacher can,
by luck, produce one or two good voices, but the reputable
teacher gives something to all students that makes them
progress at their own optimum pace. "High notes
created in the shortest time... technically faulty singing
will be corrected... develop great vocal power...etc."
An honest teacher could never promise so much. Students
who hear these outlandish claims should be on guard.
Such dishonest teachers will never admit their inability
to keep their promises. Instead, my fault of failure
is laid on the student's head. "I'm sorry to have
to tell you this, but you have a physical defect that
will never allow you to become a singer." Don't
believe it. Unless a throat specialist tells you that
you have a serious throat problem, you can sing!
Before I paint the perfect voice teacher, I would like
to stress that teaching is hard work, a commitment that
may take years. A teacher gives the advice gained from
years of study and hard work, and earns every penny
he or she gets. You don't get something for nothing
in this world, and if you are benefiting from your voice
lessons, then you should be glad to pay for them. Nothing
worth having in this world is easy or cheap. And a career
as a singer is a thrilling experience that only one
person in a thousand may be able to have.
Don't measure your teacher by the dollar, however. The
cheapest voice teacher is not necessarily the best bargain.
Likewise, a voice cannot be bought by the pound, so
that even the most expensive teacher may not be the
one for you. The expression, "Penny wise and pound
foolish," really applies when choosing a voice
teacher. Find the one for your needs and stick with
them!”
— excerpted from “Breaking Through: From
Rock to Opera, the Basic Technique of Voice” by
Gloria Bennett
|